GTBank: Court sets aside N242M judgement against Ekiti State govt

GTBank_ Court Sets Aside N242M judgement Against Ekiti State govt kikiotolu

By Abasi Femi Oguntayo

An Ekiti State High Court Sitting in Ado-Ekiti today, Monday August 19th, 2019 has set aside an order Nisi in the sum of Two Hundred and Fourty Two Million Naira obtained by Guaranty Trust Bank ( GTB) against the Government of Ekiti State.

GTB had early this year insituted ganishee proceedings against the Ekiti State Government to recover loans guaranteed by the State Government on behalf of Ekiti State Mojere Primary School Teachers Cooperative Society Ltd who were the defendants in the case in addition to the Attorney General & Commissioner For Justice, Ekiti State and the State Universal Education board, Ekiti State.

Guaranty Trust Bank had obtained an order Nisi from the court attaching the sum of two hundred and forty two million in the account of SUBEB.

The Honourable Attorney-General of Ekiti State. Olawale Fapohunda in his submission had urged the court to set aside the order Nisi on grounds that the order was obtained by misrepresentation of the facts in the matter.

Fapohunda argued that aside from the fact the consent of the Attorney- General was not obtained before the Plantiff. commenced ganishee proceedings, the State Government was never served the order of the court which was fatal to the plaintiffs case.

He argued that the reasoning of the plaintiff that the judgement debtor was not a proper party in ganishee proceedings is not supported by the recent Supreme Court decision on the subject matter.

Citing the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Gwede v. Delta State House of Assembly & Anor (2019) LPELR-47441(SC), Fapohunda submitted that it is now settled that in proceedings for the grant of ganishee order absolute, the judgement debtor is a proper party.

In his ruling Honourable Justice Abiodun Adesodun held that the failure to serve the Order Nisi on the Ekiti State State Government gravely affected the Order Nisi and therefore held that the order is liable to be set aside. He thereafter set aside the order Nisi and made no award of costs.

To Top